Glen Beck's interpretaion of Che

I feel inclined to disagree with Beck. Although I have not truly studied Che’s history, I feel that Beck’s interpretation of him that was given on the cnn show was most likely extremely biased. One reason for this would be that Che’s ideas were based on socialist and communist ideals. Also they only talk about Che’s war atrocities while eliminating his reasons for doing what he did. Although Che may have been a terrible person, I feel that it is a bit extreme to be relating him to Hitler.
After watching numerous shows with Beck on CNN I have grown to dislike Becks voice and speaking mannerisms. He gets his points across by speaking as if he is a lawyer and almost as if he speaking to children. Another thing that Beck does is to speak is if he is absolutely correct using facts and people to support his thoughts. He also uses a lot of metaphoric expressions to get his points across.